The High Court has ruled that someone who does not speak English cannot use marriage as a means to live and work in the United Kingdom. (Three women brought the case on behalf of their husbands. BBC Radio 2, News. There was no mention as to who paid for the litigation.)
If judges can make the law (rather than Parliament) then - for the general good of the nation - why can't judges determine that no foreign and Commonwealth men can use marriage as a means to occupy the UK?
Friday 16 December 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
