Desperately Deceitful Disinformation

Activists working (at taxpayers' expense) in Britain's thriving immigration industry argue, to gain sympathy for their cause, that asylum seekers are "desperate". They surely are. But not because they fear persecution back home. They're desperate because they've spent a lot of money (£4-20,000 for the Channel crossing alone) and so if they're returned to their own country that's money down the drain. Just as important is that they've bade farewell to their friends and relatives saying they're going to live in the UK, so if they are returned home (which doesn't happen under this Johnson Government) they'll be seen to have failed and will feel humiliated.

Parliament Rules - OK?

Britain's armed forces & immigration rules purport to have the same main objective - prevent foreign occupation of these islands.But the Royal Air Force flies in thousands of Afghans to live here and the Royal Navy brings an assortment of "sans papiers" (mostly young men) ashore from the English Channel. While the hundreds of British servicemen killed and maimed in recent years are mostly in the Army. The UK Border Force, an arm of British immigration controls, also brings ashore illegals who have crossed the Channel from France. Which is, of course, the very opposite of what it was designed to do. The British Government gives the orders. Imagine if enemy paratroopers want to land in Britain. so the authorities clear a landing place, remove obstacles that might hinder them and any guns that may be used against them. This is what Britain's immigration controls are like: because, though there are Immigration Officers, they are rendered impotent and irrelavent by an army of lawyers, NGOs and tribunals, backed up by the European Convention on Human Rights and the 1951 UN Convention on Refugees, funded by public money - us. Barmy! We wouldn't prepare a field for enemy paratroopers. Would we? These are British decisions. Made by Parliament. Which can unmake them. If there is the will. Parliament is supreme.

Will Britain's next Prime Minister come clean?

In 2 weeks the Conservative Party will have a new leader and Britain will have a new Prime Minister. Now ia the time to discover whether Liz Truss (the favourite) or Rishi Sunak (the only other contender) is conservative in the sense that he/she will not reform Britain's chaotic/unjust asylum system which brings illegals into Britain (over 20,000 so far this year) and provides them with hotel accommodation, allows them to roam free and provides them with legal aid once they are "lawyered up" for the numerous appeals until they get the decision they want. The Government says it has international obligations, but these are British decisions. There's no international law that says legal aid has to be given or that any appeals are necessary. Truss and Sunak should have to make it clear to the electorate whether they will end these concessions. And, just as important, explain why illegals who could have claimed asylum in France and are clearly not genuine refugees aren't promptly deported.

Citing International Law is Deceptive

We're told everyone is entitled to claim asylum. But that doesn't mean everyone should get refugee status. There's nothing in international law to say that lawyers have to be involved, or legal aid given, or that appeals (until a favourable decision is arrived at) can be made. These are British Government decisions. The Government could and should end these concessions. In which case, the Home Secretary could instruct Immigration Officers to promptly deport any illegal who could have claimed asylum in France, Belgium, etc. on the grounds they're clearly not genuine refugees. Then this long ongoing (since 2018) invasion of these islands by thousands (over 20,000 so far this year) of illegals crossing the English Channel in small boats would soon stop. ... A year ago we all saw on our TV screens that thousands of "British nationals" had to be brought back to the UK from Kabul when the Taleban took over the city. These thousands were, of course, Afghans. There's nothing in international law that says refugee status results in permanent residence, let alone in British nationality. So why does the British Government do it? TV and radio interviewers never ask senior politicians this question. Why not?

Why isn't the Government held accountable for its Deceit?

Many Brits (particularly in England/Wales) are unhappy with immigration. If that were not so we would still be in the EU. But net immigration has gone up since Brexit! Both Leavers and erstwhile Remainers are victims of deceit by this Government. This is very serious. It shouldn't be ignored. Or swept under the carpet. The Government should be held to account.