Morality ... and Asylum

Lithuania won't allow asylum claims by Russians trying to avoid conscription. (BBC Radio 4 "Today".) Does Lithuania grant asylum to young men from other countries avoiding conscription? If so, that severely undermines the morality that is the basis of asylum. Britain gives asylum to avoid conscription. Which can be said to be hypocritical, because when Britain had conscription young men who avoided it were treated with contempt, if not jailed.... Perhaps Russians could come here instead.... Russians are going to countries where they don't require visas, like Georgia. But visas are not normally required when claiming asylum. Some 30,000 people, mostly young men, have entered Britain so far this year and successfully claimed asylum. They had neither passports nor visas. An exception is for real refugees - Ukrainian women and children - who can only claim asylum in Britain if they have passports and visas. Will the same now be required of Russians?

Privilege? What Privilege?

We're told (BBC1, during her funeral procession) that one of Queen Elizabeth's "achievements" was the ending of male privilege - that is, the ending of male primogeniture. We're not told that, during her reign, foreign men are allowed to live in the UK through marriage even though British men can't live in their countries through marriage, and that despite "equality" laws it's legal to recruit/promote native British men last. So, we're not just underprivileged, we're second-class citizens in our own country. Some achievement!

Britain's New King

King Charles III ascended the throne on 8 September. Britain's politicians and media are consumed with dealing with the passing of Queen Elizabeth and Britain entering a new era.... So the creeping invasion of these islands is ignored. 45 boats bring 2,120 illegals to these shores over the weekend.... The only constant in this world is change. sot it's time - it;s long overdue - for Britain to leave the 1951 UN Convention on Refugees. The world is a very different place than it was in 1951. Asylum is now used as a scam. On an extensive scale. Mainly young men who, if they were genuine refugees could have claimed asylum in France, prefer to take up permanent residence here by claiming asylum. The UK, unlike other European countries, doesn't have ID cards so in the unlikely case of their asylum claim being rejected it's easy to lose themselves in society here. Another attraction is ... we speak English! And we're perceived as being weak and divided. Unlikely to change.

Britain's New Government

Now that native British men have been excluded from the 4 great Offices of State - Prime Minister, Chancellor of the Exchequer, Foreign and Home Secretaries - in the name of justice and goodness it's time the unjust law known as "positive action" which, despite "equality" laws, makes it legal to recruit/promote native British men last be revoked.... It's also time to end the long ongoing invasion of these islands by illegals (who could have claimed asylum in France). Or is it all part of a wicked plot by the Conservatives to diminish further the status, power and influence of native British men in their own country?... This new Government emphasises the importance of saving the NHS; both the Prime Minister (Liz Truss) and the Health Secretary (Therese Coffey, Britain's new Deputy PM) have outlined their priorities, but neither has said a word (not a dicky bird!) about stopping Britain's NHS from being used as the world's International Health Service. (Which it is since other countries have medical ID cards, and Britain doesn't.)

Pretty Pointless Patel

It's pretty pointless having a system of passports and visas which have time/work constraints if foreigners who don't have either are allowed to take up permanent residence in the UK. It's also pretty pointless having armed forces which are supposed to protect these islands from foreign occupation if occupation is given away. It's also pretty pointless in having Priti Patel as Home Secretary since there's no sign of her ever deporting any of the over 25,000 illegals who've crossed the English Channel so far this year. Her days may well be numbered, since Britain is to have a new Prime Minister next week.

An Appalling Account

Well-fed, well-dressed young men looking nothing like refugees cross the English Channel in small boats in large numbers and run up the beach at Dungeness to be taken away in waiting cars, says a woman who lives nearby (BBC Radio 4 "Today" this morning). These boats aren't being escorted by the UK Border Force or the RNLI. They are coming in "under the radar". This is an appalling neglect of Britain's borders, which can't be explained away as being international law, in the same way that escorted illegals are. Boris Johnson, no longer Britain's Prime Minister from next week, has shown great concern for Ukraine's borders while being totally indifferent to Britain's porous borders. He should be held to account for this. It's very serious. But there seems to be no machinery for bringing this about. Why isn't there? And there's no evidence of top politicians wanting to end this flagrant breech of justice and the law. Why not?