It's not the Distant Past, it's the Recent Past... that needs Rectifying

It's not the 19th century and earlier that America and Britain should be self-flagellating about. It's more recent history that has caused huge demographic changes about which we should be self-critical. In 1965 President Johnson relaxed the USA's strict immigration laws. And in 1979 Mrs Thatcher broke her promise to stop foreign men using marriage to live in the UK. Since about 10,000 men a year exploit this loophole that has resulted in some 400,000 men (and their children) living in these islands.

The 1960s... when the Future began

It's a truism that the future began years ago. Decades ago, in fact. In Britain's case back in 1962. Conscription had just ended, so young foreign men wanted to come here to avoid call-up in their own countries. The Commonwealth Immigration Act came into force in June of that year, having been deliberately delayed to enable as many people to come here who wanted to. The result was a rush of young men. After June 1962 they sought loopholes, lawyers and marriage.And brought in relatives..... In the case of the USA the future began in 1965 when Presidetn Johnson relaxed the country's strict immigration laws. Conscription ended in 1975, which was an added attraction for young men from other countries who wanted to avoid the draft.

Will no taker of silk see the Light?

The President of the Supreme Court, Lord Reid, defends the independence of the judiciary (BBC Radio 4 "Today"). Activist lawyers prevent deportations. Surely one of the obligations of Government is to defend the realm.... Britain's borders are clearly porous. So surely there is at least one judge who can see the light and prosecute the Government for failing to defend the realm. Justice shouldn't be one-sided: it requires balance. Which is, indeed, its symbol.

The Welfare of Britain and the British People

Italy's former Interior Minister Mr. Salvini goes to court today. He is being prosecuted for not allowing illegal aliens to land in Italy. His defence is that he did it "for Italy and the Italian people". So, conversely, why isn't Britain's Home Secretary prosecuted for allowing illegal aliens to land in Britain contrary to the welfare of Britain and the British people? (Over 7,000 have crossed the English Channel in small boats so far this year). And it begs the questions: Who brought this case against Mr. Salvini and who pays for it?

Funding our own Occupation

Britain's flourishing immigration industry, funded by the poor British taxpayer, comprises two barmy armies in confrontation with each other. Lawyers, NGOs, Advisors, the Council of Europe and politicians v. immigration officers, judges & Tribunals, court officials, and consular officials...and politicians.... Politicians are in both camps because as well as being responsible for laws the single biggest issue politicians help their constituents with is immigration - i.e. helping foreigners to live in these small, stressed, and divided overcrowded islands.

Flannel and Waffle on the "Titanic"

Labour Party Leader Sir Kier Starmer's themes for his first Party Conference speech were said to be pro-Britain and pro-family. If he's truly pro-Britain he'd oppose allowing illegals to take up permanent residecnce here. And he'd oppose foreign men being allowed to use marriage to live in the UK. If they want to raise families they can do that in their own countries. By ignoring these problems Sir Kier's speech was just flannel and waffle. And Britain continues to rush headlong into disaster while politicians re-arrange the deckchairs on our very own "Titanic".

The Whampanogs have it!

"I certainly regret it!" - said a Whampanog referring to the arrival of the "Mayflower" in 1620. (BBC Radio 4 "Today".) The Pilgrim Fathers crossed the Atlantic because of persecution, which is the reason for refugee status today. They numbered about 100. The number of illegals claiming refugee status who have crossed the English Channel in small boats and been allowed into England this year is over 5,000. We'll certainly regret it.