Justice requires Politicians before Lawyers

It is clearly unjust that foreigners can use "equality" laws (which include the word "nationality") to deprive Brits of work, promotion & housing, etc. And that foreign women can deprive British men of them, both because they are foreign and female. But don't expect lawyers to do anything about it. "We don't dispense justice," say the lawyers. "We dispense the law."... So it's up to politicians to end this injustice. But there's no sign of that happening. Which is pretty depressing.

Justice requires Balance II

The fact that, it seems, that no one, not even Migration Watch (?) or Nigel Farage (?), can bring a legal case against the British Government for Not Controlling our Borders exposes a serious flaw in British Justice. Because all immigration cases are one-sided. They have the sole aim to support someone's claim to be allowed to live in the UK. That they might not succeed is immaterial. Justice is symbolised by balance, and requires balance.

"racial injustice" - in spades

#President Biden implied in his inauguration speech yesterday he is against "racial injustice". But he allows foreigners to live in the United States even though Americans can't live in their countries. This is a deliberate infliction of demographic change on his "fellow Americans" and is chronic racial injustice - in spades.

Catch them Young... And Teach them Wrong

Every month in Britain a farmer commits suicide. And every 2 weeks a soldier commits suicide. But, never mind, Brownies are taught to oppose the "patriarchy" (Lucy Porter on BBC TV "Mastermind", 28 December). Cry, the (once-upon-a-time) Beloved Country!... "Everyone's right to life shall be protected by law," states Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights. But it doesn't, or maybe can't. Instead, the Convention is used to enable foreigners occupy the UK. Even though there is nothing in the Convention about immigration control. So it shouldn't.

Justice requires Balance

Lawyers intervene in immigration cases when they think an immigration officer's decision might be wrong. But they only intervene when someone wants to stay in the UK. Decisions might equally be wrong the other way, by allowing someone to stay. But then lawyers never ever intervene. This is unjust. Justice requires balance..... Allowing lawyers to intervene in immigration cases isn't God-given. It's a choice by politicians; as in other countries. Until control is back in the hands of immigration officers there should be no more legal aid for immigration. Funding our own occupation is nonsensical.

Britain: And the Case of Contradictory Policies Working to Opposite Purposes

Britain's Prime Minister,Boris Johnson, has announced an increase in Defence spending. Defence is to prevent these islands being occupied by foreigners. But taxpayers' money is also provided for legal aid for immigration cases. This litigation contests immigration decisions, and, often successful, enables foreigners to live here. These decisions are often based on the 1951 UN Convention on Refugees andon Human Rights. Both set up during the Cold War and with the Second World War in everyone's minds. Now clearly outdated in their intent when considering immigration. The contradiction between spending money on warfare while spending money to bring about occupation is very stark. And absurd. And should be ended. Forthwith. If not sooner!

Equality reinforces Inequality

Britain's obsession with "equality" leads to more inequality. Same sex marriage and immigration laws mean that foreign men who are wives and foreign women who are husbands can live here.So every day native British men become strangers in their own land.