A Lesson for us All

When the mutineers took HMS Bounty to Pitcairn they also took with them 4 Tahitian men and some women - but fewer than the total number of men. That was one problem. Fletcher Christian didn't want to be a dictator. So the Britons had a Council. After a while they voted (by 1) to deprive the Tahitians of their land. Christian argued that this was such an important issue there should be a delay. (Brexit anyone?) One man told his wife, who told the Tahitian men. They went to their "marae" to decide what to do. They concluded they had no option but to kill all the Britons, including those they liked. They stole the guns. The ensuing fight resulted in only 3 survivors - hard-line mutineers. The women threw them out. When only one man survived, Alexander Smith, his wife pleaded for him to be allowed back. He taught the children their lessons. Sadly, Pitcairn these days still has big problems.

40 Years On

Most of the 39 people who died after entering the UK illegally a few days ago are thought to be Vietnamese. Mrs Thatcher was elected on 3 May 1979 with a large majority and a promise to curb immigration. But before the month of May was out she agreed that Vietnamese who had gone to Hong Kong be allowed to settle in the UK. It was obvious that once a community was established here that other Vietnamese would come. In 1980 I had legal aid for my divorce, so I applied for legal aid to bring a case of treason against Mrs Thatcher for allowing foreigners to live in the UK while Brits can't live in their countries. But the Law Society refused me the necessary Green Certificate. (Though legal aid is given for immigration cases.) 40 years ago in October 1979 a youngish man (me) cycled to London's Parliament Square in the pouring rain. The Press had said there would be a demonstration against Mrs Thatcher's election promise to stop foreign men from using marriage to live in the UK. There was not a soul around. Not even traffic. I left, but went back at lunchtime. It was just the same. No one. Still pouring heavily. On 30 October the Immigration Minister, Timothy Raison, announced the Government wouldn't be keeping its promise. When asked why by Douglas Stewart on Radio 4 "Tonight", he replied "Because of the fuss." The result is some 400,000 men (10,000 a year) live in these unfortunate islands. If they had all arrived at once perhaps people would have noticed.

We're all Puppets on a String

The Brexit imbroglio caused by politicians, lawyers, etc.(incl. voters) is caused by immigration which is also a big long ongoing muddle that is the result of disputes between politicians, lawyers, etc.(voters who want it and innocently pretend that the trouble it has caused has nothing to do with them). Immigration is also responsible for "equality" laws and for their offspring "positive action" which gives legal cover for prioritising everyone over native British men. The carers in a care home I visit are all foreign. They don't stay long. It's a fair bet that having established themselves here they then find more lucrative and less demanding work. So there is an endless turnover of staff. Immigration, like its offspring Brexit, is a not-very-Merry-go-round.

"Equality" = A Very Vicious Circle of Inequality

Foreign men are entitled by law to deprive Brits of work and promotion. The 1965 law led to the 1975 Sex Discrimination Act, which entitled women to deprive men of work and promotion. Although this law doesn't apply to immigration, as was determined by the House of Lords on 7 July 1983, its "teeth", the Equal Opportunities Commission, campaigned vigorously and successfully to defeat Mrs Thatcher's 1979 election manifesto promise to stop foreign men from using marriage to live in the UK. These foreign men are, of course, entitled to deprive.....etc. An endless vicious circle. Forced. And very vicious.

High Moral Ground

A fair and firm immigration system holds the moral high ground. This is not only because it protects the indigenous inhabitants (who probably have lethal defence forces for the same purpose) but protects foreigners from having to cope with inconsistencies and muddle. The USA used to have strict controls until 1965 when President Johnson relaxed them. Hence much of the present imbroglio and unhappiness. Most illegals have entered the USA illegally and overstayed. Word of their success naturally attracts others to follow suit. Allowing foreigners to occupy your country while your own citizens can't live in theirs is clearly unfair (= immoral). It is also unjust. And to add to this injustice "equality" laws enable foreigners to deprive citizens of work and promotion. Jesus famously believed in upholding the law. So it is unChristian to render assistance to illegals. It is also immoral.

Criminals in Cahoots

The 1965 Race Relations Act enables foreigners ("nationality" is specified) to deprive Brits of work. It inspired the 1975 Sex Discrimination Act which enables women to deprive men of work. But it was used to defeat Mrs Thatcher's 1979 election promise to stop foreign men being allowed to live in the UK through marriage. So that they are entitled to deprive native Brits of work, promotion, etc. The immigration and feminist industries are criminals in cahoots. Foreigners can see this; so why can't the Crown Prosecution Service?

Unblindfold Justice

Today is International Women's Day. 19 November is, I'm told, International Men's Day, but you wouldn't've known it. Foreign wives are entitled, because of "equality" laws and the positively unequal "positive action" (see this blog of 26 July 2018) to deprive British men of work and promotion both because they are foreign and female. This is clearly unjust. Lawyers say "We don't dispense justice; we dispense the law." Lawyers can create common law (8 November 2016). Muslims can bring four wives and their children to live in the UK. He has to marry one wife legally in the UK. If he is not British she is. He can then marry three Muslim women as long as it's Islamically in a Muslim country. They are then entitled to British passports and full state benefits as single people. For a country obsessed with "equality" this is clearly unequal.. and shouldn't be tolerated.