Friday, 15 July 2016
"stupid, divisive and wrong"
David Cameron called Donald Trump "stupid, divisive and wrong".
Mr. Cameron has just taken the UK out of the EU contrary to his own wishes!
The main reason a majority of people voted to Leave the EU was because of lack of immigration control.
Mr. Cameron was responsible for that.
Mr. Trump wants stricter control of immigration to the US.....
Thursday, 14 July 2016
Mayday! (= M'aidez! = Help!)
Mrs. May in her first speech (4 mins. 16 secs.) in Downing Street yesterday made no mention of the main reason Britons had voted to Leave the European Union and why she had just become Prime Minister - immigration.
So the new broom swept the elephant in the room under the carpet.
The talented Mr. Cameron said on resigning after 6 years as Prime Minister his greatest achievement was same-sex marriage. (!)
So now foreign men can become British by marrying a man!
For me, yesterday was not a gay day.
Wednesday, 13 July 2016
LoL = Land of Lunatics
Discontent with immigration to the UK caused millions of people to vote to Leave the European Union.
In charge of immigration for the past 6 years has been Theresa May.
Today Mrs. May becomes Prime Minister!
Lunatic.
In charge of the asylum.
Monday, 11 July 2016
Appeals
During Britain's Coalition Government the Home Secretary, Mrs. Theresa May, said she was going to reduce the number of appeals in immigration cases from 17(!) to 4.
The reason for appeals is in case the first decision is wrong.
But it could equally have been wrong the other way.
Someone could have been given "Indefinite Leave to Remain" wrongly.
There is no appeal against that.
The Republic of Ireland had a Referendum on the EU.
The Government didn't like the result.
So they had another one.
The Government liked the result, and that was the end of the matter.
Sunday, 10 July 2016
Spoilt for Choice
The Council of Europe in Strasbourg, home to European human rights, states in its literature that the international community has long recognised the privileged position of women in transnational marriages because they can live in their husband's country as well as their own.
Saturday, 9 July 2016
Love Equality
Venus Williams was a complainer for equal pay for unequal work at Wimbledon.
As though she hasn't enough money!
She and her sister, today's Wimbledon singles champion, are doubles champions.
It's impossible for a man to win two prizes in the same tournament if he is a top singles player.
Equality was the argument that prevailed to defeat the Conservatives' 1979 policy to stop foreign men using marriage to live in the UK. But wives can live in their husband's country, so if they marry a foreigner they have the privilege of being able to live in two countries.
As though she hasn't enough money!
She and her sister, today's Wimbledon singles champion, are doubles champions.
It's impossible for a man to win two prizes in the same tournament if he is a top singles player.
Equality was the argument that prevailed to defeat the Conservatives' 1979 policy to stop foreign men using marriage to live in the UK. But wives can live in their husband's country, so if they marry a foreigner they have the privilege of being able to live in two countries.
Friday, 8 July 2016
The Rites of Man
Before and after 1979 the Equal Opportunities Commission campaigned vigorously against the Conservatives' election policy to stop foreign men using marriage to live in the UK.
By law the EOC was obliged to support complaints from men.
So I complained to it that foreign men were allowed to live in the UK through marriage even though British men often could not live in their countries through marriage.
The EOC's response was that my complaint was out of its ambit.
So I complained to the European Commission of Human Rights about the EOC's failure to support my complaint. Its response was that I should challenge the EOC in the UK courts.
To this end I sought legal aid. My finances entitled me to it (I was getting divorced). But the Law Society refused it.
On 7 July 1983 the House of Lords determined that the 1975 Sex Discrimination Act did not apply to immigration control. This was in the case of Regina vs Entry Clearance Officer, Bombay, Ex parte Amin.
Therefore the EOC's campaign was illegal.
Furthermore the European Commission of Human Rights acted against its own rules. Article 26 of the Convention had not been complied with: because not all domestic remedies had been exhausted when on 11 May 1982 it determined in favour of three women whose husbands were not allowed to live in the UK.
By law the EOC was obliged to support complaints from men.
So I complained to it that foreign men were allowed to live in the UK through marriage even though British men often could not live in their countries through marriage.
The EOC's response was that my complaint was out of its ambit.
So I complained to the European Commission of Human Rights about the EOC's failure to support my complaint. Its response was that I should challenge the EOC in the UK courts.
To this end I sought legal aid. My finances entitled me to it (I was getting divorced). But the Law Society refused it.
On 7 July 1983 the House of Lords determined that the 1975 Sex Discrimination Act did not apply to immigration control. This was in the case of Regina vs Entry Clearance Officer, Bombay, Ex parte Amin.
Therefore the EOC's campaign was illegal.
Furthermore the European Commission of Human Rights acted against its own rules. Article 26 of the Convention had not been complied with: because not all domestic remedies had been exhausted when on 11 May 1982 it determined in favour of three women whose husbands were not allowed to live in the UK.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
