Citing International Law is Deceptive

We're told everyone is entitled to claim asylum. But that doesn't mean everyone should get refugee status. There's nothing in international law to say that lawyers have to be involved, or legal aid given, or that appeals (until a favourable decision is arrived at) can be made. These are British Government decisions. The Government could and should end these concessions. In which case, the Home Secretary could instruct Immigration Officers to promptly deport any illegal who could have claimed asylum in France, Belgium, etc. on the grounds they're clearly not genuine refugees. Then this long ongoing (since 2018) invasion of these islands by thousands (over 20,000 so far this year) of illegals crossing the English Channel in small boats would soon stop. ... A year ago we all saw on our TV screens that thousands of "British nationals" had to be brought back to the UK from Kabul when the Taleban took over the city. These thousands were, of course, Afghans. There's nothing in international law that says refugee status results in permanent residence, let alone in British nationality. So why does the British Government do it? TV and radio interviewers never ask senior politicians this question. Why not?

Why isn't the Government held accountable for its Deceit?

Many Brits (particularly in England/Wales) are unhappy with immigration. If that were not so we would still be in the EU. But net immigration has gone up since Brexit! Both Leavers and erstwhile Remainers are victims of deceit by this Government. This is very serious. It shouldn't be ignored. Or swept under the carpet. The Government should be held to account.

Political Deception

"Criminal gangs bring vulnerable people on a perilous journey across the Channel." This could have been said by Britain's Home Secretary Priti Patel but was in fact said by a senior female Labour politician. It is disinformation worthy of George Orwell's Newspeak or Vladimir Putin denying there's a war in Ukraine.. Because what it really means is that thousands of determined young men pay thousands of pounds to (mostly) foreign individuals who are (probably) legally selling boats so that the aforesaid young men can cross the Channel into England safely escorted by first the French and then the British, whose UK Border Force is supposedly meant to prevent illegal immigration into these islands. Therefore the criminality is being carried out on the orders of the British Government.

Why does the British Government Perpetrate and Perpetuate a Scam?

Refugee status is a scam. Operated on a large scale. By the British Government. Politicians say they have to honour international obligations. But there is no obligation for refugee status to be other than temporary. So why does the Government give them permanent residence? Let alone lead to British nationality. But it does. So they can't be sent "home" once the supposed threat of persecution is over. .... In August last year thousands of British nationals had to be evacuated from Afghanistan. They were Afghans who had acquired British nationality via the refugee route and had gone "home" for their holidays and to visit relatives, etc.

Where is the Normative Legal Remedy?

Everyday foreigners have to leave Britain because their visa has expired. And everyday Brits have to leave other countries for the same reason. But everyday the British Government allows illegals to come here and get permanent residence! It's not just unjust, it's complicity in criminal activity - which requires a normative legal remedy in the courts.

We Wuz Tricked!

This Government is in power because of Brexit. Which would never have come about but for voters' concerns about immigration. Which has gone up since Brexit! Conservative MPs currently vying to become Prime Minister will talk about anything to boost their chances, but none of them will say a word about immigration. Why? This wilfull ignoring of the problem makes them appear as if they are dissembling - like Putin. We wuz tricked out of Leaving the European Union. But nobody'll notice if we just talk about the Cost of Living, Energy Prices and Raising/Cutting taxes. And the War in Ukraine.

"Rights" mean only what lawyers want them to mean

"Everyone's right to life shall be protected by law." Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights. This means that countries that are signaturies of the Convention and have conscription - like Russia and Ukraine - are breaking the law. Either that or the concept of "rights" is a nonsense. Which is it? (Come to that, what about volunteer armed forces? They are put in harm's way, so how are they legal?).... "Is there any point in having armed forces?" is on this blog on 1 July 2018.