End the Gravy Train!

Lawyers have long been involved in immigration. It's an endless gravy train. It's also undemocratic that lawyers over-rule elected politicians. They justify it by jealousy guarding judicial independence. But former senior Supreme Court judge Neuberger said "We're only doing what politicians want us to." So politicians can over-rule judges. If they have the will to... When peasants controlled London during the Peasants' Revolt in 1381 they didn't hang the lords. They hanged the judges...... "Power to Judges..." is on this blog on 8 November 2016, while "Power to Parliament" is (appropriately) on 5 November 2016.

"There's one law for the poor..." And it unjustly favours them

Shamima Begum, the jihadi who went to Syria and had her British nationality revoked, has won a second appeal to restore it..... It's a bit rich the Appeal Court judges determining that she needs to be in the UK to argue her case, because thousands of people are turned back at UK borders every year. (Chris Huhne MP said 30,000/year in 2010.) Some are refused entry unjustly,in my opinion. The reason immigration officers take this hard line is because they know that once in the UK the system is wide open for abuse and they will never leave..... For a country obsessed with equality there's a glaring inequality that's overlooked. Legal aid. Shamima Begum of course gets legal aid. Someone with legal aid has a whip hand, as far as litigation is concerned, over someone who doesn't. They can't lose. Legal aid is given for immigration (unlike in the USA). But no one gets it to oppose immigration. I know; I've tried. Legal aid is, of course, taxpayers' money. So we fund our own demographic displacement. What a country! What a mess! What injustice! Why doesn't anyone bend the knee about this?

Mrs Thatcher's Discord

Edward Colston's statue in Bristol was replaced by a statue of an Afro-Caribbean woman with a raised fist. A deliberately confrontational gesture (of both fist and statue). It's a fair bet that woman can live in a Caribbean or African country which I (and most Brits) can't. She is very privileged if she can live in two different non-EU countries..... On 4 May 1979 Mrs Thatcher said outside 10 Downing Street "Where there is discord let there be harmony." She had just been elected Prime Minister with a promise to restrict immigration. But within days she allowed Vietnamese to settle here, and within weeks Iranians. And in October it was announced she had broken her promise to stop foreign men using marriage to live in the UK. Since some 10,000 men a year exploit this loophole there are now around 400,000 foreign men and their children living in these islands. Where there was harmony there is now discord.

Institutional Inequality

Most nations control their borders on a reciprocal basis. Britain has to be different. The Government talks of three million Hong Kong citizens being allowed to settle here. (When Hong Kong was handed back to China in 1997 50,000 Hong Kongers and their dependents were allowed to settle in the UK.) Brits can't live in Hong Kong. Not unless they are Chinese Brits, of course. Being allowed to live in two non-EU countries is the great privilege of the age. (See this blog of 25 March 2020.) It is also denied to most people. Britain, obsessed with equality, is peculiarly unequal.

If any Statue is to be pulled down it should be Mrs Thatcher's

Mrs Thatcher was elected on 3 May 1979 with a promise to cut immigration to the UK. But within days she allowed Vietnamese to settle here, and within weeks Iranians. Within months she had broken her promise to stop foreign men using marriage to live in the UK. So why has she got a statue?!.... Britain is perceived as weak and divided. In the 1970s Vietnamese boat people sailed past Chinese ports and Portuguese Macao to get to Hong Kong. In the Summer of 1979 Iranians on the wrong side of the Revolution knew where to go - Heathrow..... Illegals from Vietnam and Iran are now encouraged to come here by their compatriots already here..... And Vietnam and Iran want hard currency, so they don't take back their illegals who other countries want to deport..... Yesterday a record number of illegals crossed the English Channel - 180 in 15 small boats - and were escorted into Dover by the UK Border Force. This ridiculous situation of the UK Border Force doing the exact opposite of what it was established to do was, of course, on the orders of Britain's Home Secretary, Priti Patel. More boats arrived today. Priti Patel today unveiled Britain's POST-BREXIT POINTS-BASED IMMIGRATION SYSTEM. This "offers equality of access to people of all countries." It's not equality if Brits can live in EU countries but can't live in, say, Asian countries. Reciprocity between countries is equality.

"Control our Borders!"

"Control our borders!" was the mantra that won the Brexit Referendum in 2016. Some borders! Some control! Non-EU immigration to the UK is unjust, unequal and unfair. But it's deliberate. Muslims are allowed to bring 4 "wives" and their children to live in the UK. That's deliberate. So is the chain migration of relatives. Deliberate = Control. Just ineffective control..... It's said failed asylum seekers can't be deported to their own country if it's at war. But no country is at war. Wars have to be declared. There are plenty of conflicts in the world. But no wars. So they can be deported. Failure to deport illegals is to surrender to invasion and occupation.

A Double Triple Whammy

Foreigners can live in the UK though Brits can't live in their countries. "Equality" laws entitle them to "equality" with Brits. "Positive action" entitles the BBC, British Transport Police, etc. to recruit native British men last. .... A triple whammy. .... Foreigners know this. British MPs know that. Black Lives Matter know it. Another triple whammy. So British men are second-class citizens in their own country, (David) Lammy.