Tuesday, 10 October 2017
"Lock 'er up!"
Discrimination will have nowhere to hide, says Mrs May (BBC Radio 4 "Today") about her "ethnicity audit" (as though public money couldn't be better spent!) This is a smokescreen to hide the two BIG inequalities she's responsible for: (1) Allowing the UK to be occupied by other peoples; (2) Allowing those same people to deprive (because of "equality" laws) Britons of work, housing, etc. It should be possible to use the laws that govern the Equality and Human Rights Commission (more public money!) to prosecute the Prime Minister. But the system discriminates - unfairly. In 1980 I had legal aid for my divorce, so I applied for legal aid to bring a case against Mrs. Thatcher - but the Law Society refused it. Good luck to anyone who tries to bring a case against Mrs. May. "Lock 'er up!" (For the dual meaning in English of "discrimination" please see "Language Traduces Thought".)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Judges determined that a Muslim school's policy of sex segregation was "unlawful". (Yesterday's News.) What's the betting we paid for this judgement! Every day young men enter Britain illegally from France and aren't sent back to France. Why don't judges determine this Government policy to be unlawful? If they did, and if these illegals were promptly sent back to France, they would soon stop trying to cross the Channel. This would, of course, also stop the attacks made on British lorry drivers in Calais. So why don't lorry drivers bring such a case. They should, at least, try!!!
"Welcome to the Asylum", published by Centre for Policy Studies, 2001, page 8, says: "The judicial interpretation of the Convention differs markedly from country to country, with the UK Courts arguably being one of the most generous to asylum seekers. As a result, successive governments have often found their policies emasculated by the Courts." Judges being so jealous of their independence, surely they can put their services to good use in the prosecution of politicians who allow the UK to be occupied by other peoples to the detriment of the nation?
Post a Comment