Banging on on Afghanistan

Boris Johnson keeps banging on about "women's rights" in Afghanistan. But he says not a word about "men's rights" in Britain. Because he doubtless approves of the unjust law known as "positive action" that entitles the BBC, police, GCHQ, etc. to recruit/promote native British men LAST. And he also says nothing about protecting our borders, which is - or should be - every native Brits "right".... Hundreds of British nationals are still in Afghanistan. This exposes for everyone to see the long ongoing absurdity of Britain's asylum system. These people, mostly young men, have found a way to get around normal immigration controls. Having been granted asylum and acquired British nationality they then go "home" for their holidays! The system was being abused back in 2001, the year of the 11 September attacks, as was recorded in "Welcome to the Asylum", published that year by Centre for Policy Studies. If the author hoped to improve the system it clearly didn't work.

Historians say History doesn't Repeat itself... But...

In 376 AD the Goths, under pressure from the Huns, turned up on the Northern banks of the Danube and asked the Romans permission to live in their Empire. The Romans agreed on two conditions: That they give up their weapons and their children. The Goths managed to keep many of their weapons in exchange for allowing the weapons inspectors to sleep with their wives and daughters. They defeated the Romans at the Battle of Adrianople on 9 August 378. They got their children back. Those children sacked Rome in August 410 AD.

Deception is the Better Part of Valour

"Is there any point in having armed forces?" asked "The Sun" 2 days ago. Deception plays a large part in war. And in politics. Bringing thousands of Afghans to live in the UK is presented (by the Home Secretary) as a success. But the whole point of having armed forces is to prevent the occupation of these islands by foreigners!..... A couple of years ago a Royal Navy recruitmnt ad. showed a warship picking up illegals in the Mediterranean. And Rear-Admiral Parry proudly boasted that the Royal Navy had rescued 18,000 people from the sea. That was his way of saying the Royal Navy has brought 18,000 illegals to live in Europe. Which is not contributing to Britain's defence.... This blog earlier asked the same question "Is there any point in having armed forces?" back on 1 July 2018.

Death in Paradise - in this case Plymouth - A Tragedy long in the Making

A young man of 22 in Plymouth shot and killed 5 people - his mother and 4 strangers - and then himself on 12 August. This tragedy is not the fault of the gunman. He is said to have been very unhappy because he didn't have a girlfriend. It is statistically impossible for all young men in the UK to have a girl firend. Because there are many more young men living here than there are young women. This is partly because of the many thousands of asylum seekers, almost all young men, who could have claimed asylum in France, Belgium, etc. but are allowed to live in the UK. Moreover, back in 1979 Mrs Thatcher promised in her election manifesto that she would end the concession whereby foreign men can use marriage to live in the UK. But she did not keep her promise. It was said earlier in the Press that she wouldn't be able to implement this policy because it would contravene the European Convention on Human Rights. So on 10 June 1977 I complained to the European Commission of Human Rights about this very issue. But the Commission refused to investigate my complaint. Some 10,000 foreign and Commonwealth men a year exploit this immigration loophole, so since 1979 probably more than 400,000 men are living in these islands through having found someone to marry..... (Plymouth is my home town - there are lots of Passmores there.)

Disinformation

Politicians and the RNLI say illegals crossing the English Channel are "rescued" from the sea. This implies these illegals are honest sailors going about their business. Whereas in fact they've come to occupy these islands. The politicians and RNLI are thus using disinformation, an Orwellian tactic usually associated with Russia and China to further their own interests. Not facilitate foreign occupation. ..Rear-Admiral Parry proudly claimed the Royal Navy has "rescued" 18,000 people from the Mediterranean. This implies they have been returned safely to their homes. Whereas in fact they've been brought to Europe. This disinformation is a smokescreen that obscures the justification for the Royal Navy's existence - which is its duty to protect these islands from foreign occupation. Why does it do this? Becaause it's ordered to by the Government.... Meanwhile, the Royal Navy's flagship is heading a task force to the South China Sea, there to impress the Chinese. Who would be much more impressed if the Royal Navy stayed in home waters preventing invasion.

Epetitions to Parliament are Pointless!

MPs' response to an epetition is to continue with legal aid for immigration. British politicians should be ashamed! There's absolutely no reason why lawyers should be involved in immigration cases. It's a money bonanza for lawyers. At our expense. With no end in sight. Immigration should be left to Immigration Officers. If we go abroad and an Immigration Officer tells us to go... we go. A country that funds its own occupation deserves all it gets.... Besides, it's pointless having an elaborate and expensive system of tribunals and appeals when on the rare occasions they've been exhausted ( (along with the participants) the failed asylum seeker isn't deported. So much so that when someone's immigration status is said to be a "failed asylum seeker" it's readily accepted and no one bats an eyelid.

More Signatures Needed

There's an epetition to Parliament for the UK to withdraw from the 1951 UN Convention on Refugees. The Prime Minister has no intention of leaving the Convention, but more signatures could result in a Parliamentary debate on the matter.... Over 8o million people in war zones around the world have the legal right to live in the UK. Leaving the Convention would end this right. But it wouldn't end refugee status in the UK, which would then become a concession (instead of a "right"). The current elaborate asylum system involving many lawyers and translators and endless appeals would be dismantled. Such a system was not necessary when former Prime Minister David Cameron determined that 20,000 Syrian refugees be allowed to settle in these islands, following the death of a small boy in the Aegean.