"Equality" = A Very Vicious Circle of Inequality

Foreign men are entitled by law to deprive Brits of work and promotion. The 1965 law led to the 1975 Sex Discrimination Act, which entitled women to deprive men of work and promotion. Although this law doesn't apply to immigration, as was determined by the House of Lords on 7 July 1983, its "teeth", the Equal Opportunities Commission, campaigned vigorously and successfully to defeat Mrs Thatcher's 1979 election manifesto promise to stop foreign men from using marriage to live in the UK. These foreign men are, of course, entitled to deprive.....etc. An endless vicious circle. Forced. And very vicious.

High Moral Ground

A fair and firm immigration system holds the moral high ground. This is not only because it protects the indigenous inhabitants (who probably have lethal defence forces for the same purpose) but protects foreigners from having to cope with inconsistencies and muddle. The USA used to have strict controls until 1965 when President Johnson relaxed them. Hence much of the present imbroglio and unhappiness. Most illegals have entered the USA illegally and overstayed. Word of their success naturally attracts others to follow suit. Allowing foreigners to occupy your country while your own citizens can't live in theirs is clearly unfair (= immoral). It is also unjust. And to add to this injustice "equality" laws enable foreigners to deprive citizens of work and promotion. Jesus famously believed in upholding the law. So it is unChristian to render assistance to illegals. It is also immoral.

Criminals in Cahoots

The 1965 Race Relations Act enables foreigners ("nationality" is specified) to deprive Brits of work. It inspired the 1975 Sex Discrimination Act which enables women to deprive men of work. But it was used to defeat Mrs Thatcher's 1979 election promise to stop foreign men being allowed to live in the UK through marriage. So that they are entitled to deprive native Brits of work, promotion, etc. The immigration and feminist industries are criminals in cahoots. Foreigners can see this; so why can't the Crown Prosecution Service?

Unblindfold Justice

Today is International Women's Day. 19 November is, I'm told, International Men's Day, but you wouldn't've known it. Foreign wives are entitled, because of "equality" laws and the positively unequal "positive action" (see this blog of 26 July 2018) to deprive British men of work and promotion both because they are foreign and female. This is clearly unjust. Lawyers say "We don't dispense justice; we dispense the law." Lawyers can create common law (8 November 2016). Muslims can bring four wives and their children to live in the UK. He has to marry one wife legally in the UK. If he is not British she is. He can then marry three Muslim women as long as it's Islamically in a Muslim country. They are then entitled to British passports and full state benefits as single people. For a country obsessed with "equality" this is clearly unequal.. and shouldn't be tolerated.

Mogged

Most people who vote for Brexit did so because of immigration. Jacob Rees-Mogg MP, leading Brexiteer who this morning spoke on BBC Radio 4 "Today" about this issue, is the son of the Editor of "The Times" who is partly responsible for about half a million foreign men (and their children) living in these islands. In 1969 James Callaghan, Home Secretary and later Prime Minister, stopped foreign men from using marriage to live in the UK. "The Times" ran a campaign against this, under the banner heading "The Law against Wives". The law was repealed in 1975. These wives can now, of course, live in two countries: their husband's and the UK. So they are very privileged, since most Brits can only live in one (apart from the EU)

Make a Difference

These blogs and all the many activities on Twitter don't make a blind bit of difference. But the alternative is to do nothing. And the Hope is that someone, somewhere, somehow will pick up the torch and something positive will result. The current imbroglio in Parliament about the UK leaving the European Union is the result of an individual, Gina Miller, bringing a court case and a judge determining that Brexit should be decided by Parliament. There are many legal cases about immigration. Legal aid is provided. So in 1980, when I had legal aid for my divorce, I applied for legal aid to bring a case of Treason against Mrs Thatcher for allowing foreigners to live and work in the UK while I (and other Britons) can't live and work in their countries. I believed I had a strong case. But the Law Society refused me the necessary Green Certificate. Please see this blog of 8 November 2016 for more on this.

Another fine Mess!

Most people voted Leave in the EU Referendum because "immigration"/"control our borders". But there is more immigration to the UK from outside the EU than from within. Iran and Vietnam want hard currency and don't take back failed asylum seekers. (Please see this blog of 9 January 2019.) Mrs Thatcher was elected in 1979 with the promise to curb immigration, but within weeks she had allowed Vietnamese and Iranians to settle permanently in the UK. With an established community already here, it is no wonder that other Vietnamese and Iranians see the UK as a good place to colonise. Tony Blair says the EU has changed its stance on freedom of movement since the 2016 EU Referendum. And Chuka Umunna MP says the Government can legally deport Romanians who scrounge off the UK state, but won't do it. Instead of reducing immigration by leaving the EU, we are poised to mess up the lives of the Irish, French.... and ourselves.